“100% organic” are those products without organic ingredients.
“Organic” for products with 95% of the ingredients organic.
“Made with organic products” for products made between 50 and 95% organic ingredients.
“Products with less than 50%” organic ingredients, you must specify in each ingredient that is organic.

This should be an example that should be taken into account so that the situation is clearer and the consumer to know what kind of product you choose.

From a nutritional standpoint, in organic food could not be demonstrated advantages over, taste, safety and nutritional value, with respect to conventional foods, from the economic point of view its value is much higher, approximately between 20 and 100%.

From a legal standpoint, an organic product is one that is certified by a competent authority. In Argentina, the Chamber of nuclear Certifying companies authorized by the State for that purpose. And organic is defined as a separate production system that results in a food free of chemicals and toxic substances or potential for human health.

Possibility Related Posts:

• Human health determined by environmental conditions
• Reasons to consume Organic Food
• Benefits Of Consuming Organic Food
• Certification Of Organic Food
• Do you produce disease?

Many people feel admiration for nature, respect. They are sensitive to the beauty of wild scenery, plants and animals. In this generosity, compassion, nothing to do with a utility that can be natural, seeing it as something far more important than “natural resources” for using, selling or eating. Of course we need to use natural, but not good considering it only as something used.

The sense that nature is far more than the things that take advantage of, to realize that the existence of human beings share with nature, it is proud to disperse knowledge. This knowledge allows to look silly for saying “first is the man.” We must be good, but we should also respect others.

I saw a poster saying that the dolphin is the “heritage of mankind” to me offensive, I find that it’s better to feel that the dolphins (each and becoming, human or not) was the world heritage, or himself, or the universe or who is the owner of “” (non-human) as many say Aboriginal people (“Indians”).

Living with nature is something that is pure, high, light, beyond the utilitarian selfishness. Respect and admire the wild is the attitude of a healthy, normal, is a healthy relationship with the world, with reality. This is good, without cost to deliver results, personal gain, profit. But also enhance all those things.

Almost all of us realize that the fewer natural scenery, wild, free animals. And more and more garbage, cement, air and water poisoned. And that looks dangerous.

Some do not realize or believe that anything that does not matter, because they experience a wall that is closed, the people and machines and therefore knew nothing more than political, economic, human and their work, all this can be good or bad but know and appreciate nothing more than that, is always bad.

Possible Is It? It’s easy to feel that you can not do something permanent nature, that damage is inevitable or even necessary, that the price of progress. But whatever it is that the price does not progress, it is a scam, theft, crime.

Possibility Related Posts:

• World Health Day 2010
• Environment in Cities
• Earth – Air pollution
• Globalization
• Tobacco Smoke and Health

Because of its impacts, mining is one activity that should be tightly controlled at all stages, from exploration and exploitation for the transportation, processing and consumption. In many cases, the only means strict control restrictions.

To claim that the mining company itself controlled is more than naive: it makes sense. Even the control of the government are not sufficient, considering the economic and political power that has proven mining company on them. It should empower all citizens to participate directly in this control.

But above all, the people who live in mineral-rich regions must be able to make a fully informed decision in deciding whether to allow mining activities in their territories. And if accepted, should have the power to decide how to carry out these activities, so as to ensure environmental conservation and social justice.
Despite claims about “sustainability”, mining is a serious problem and thus should be handled.

Currently, more than 60% of the materials mined in the world using surface mining methods, which cause damage to ecosystems that are installed (deforestation, water pollution and disturbance, habitat destruction). In this type can be distinguished mining, including open pit (usually rock hard metal), excavation (for construction and industrial materials such as sand, granite, slate, marble, gravel, clay, etc) laundering. and mining (application of chemicals to filter and separate the metals from the residual minerals).

Despite the promise of wealth that mining development is actually the existence of mineral wealth may even delay the development of national and local levels. According to a 1999 study Arborvitae (IUCN, WWF) Southern countries’ rich in mineral resources tend to have levels of economic growth, social welfare level is lower and more unequal income distribution in developing countries does not depend on the mineral fact, the base source The best mineral economy has more of a curse than a blessing .. “

Thus, promotion of large-scale mining is embedded in the policies, institutions and attitudes that are looking at “development” as a top-down initiative to impose on local communities and the environment – the very antithesis of eco-friendly approach focuses on meeting the economic rights, social and cultural community and future generations .

Possibility Related Posts:

• Effect on Climate – Environmental Impact
• Ozone
• Global Warming – Potential Impacts
• This summer has been the warmest of the last 40 years
• Environmental Impact

There are many potential impacts of global warming than hypothetically affect the environment and human life according to the theory of global warming. The main thing is the average temperature increased gradually.

From here, there are a number of different effects such as rising sea levels, changes in agricultural ecosystems, the spread of tropical diseases, the increasing intensity of natural phenomena. Some of this phenomenon will produce today, but it is difficult to determine a direct relationship to global warming.

Main Effects

Climate change is predicted to have the potential to lead massive changes, and potentially irreversible climate change, resulting from the impact of global reach. the effect of melting is one of the most important and influential now, without adding greenhouse gases is another important issue affecting the world. Some examples of prediction of change:

* Significant decline in ocean circulation that transports warm water to the North Atlantic.
* Great reduction of glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica.
* Acceleration of global warming due to carbon cycle feedback in terrestrial biosphere.
* Carbon detachments permanently frozen ground regions and methane hydrates in coastal sediments.

Characteristics of the end of this change are still unclear. However, probability that one or more of these changes occur, increasing the magnitude and duration.

Impact of global warming will not be uniformly negative. Changes can be useful for some areas and also negative for others. Scientists can not accurately predict when it will happen and magnitude of impacts that could trigger global warming.

According to a survey of various regions in the world, global warming is now a major concern in people’s daily lives. In some cities have found that more than 90% of the population are concerned with the effect that this phenomenon can bring to future generations.

Possibility Related Posts:

• Climate change will raise the temperature of six degrees Spain
• The oceans are no plankton
• Chinese glaciers melting
• What is acid rain? Part 2
• What is acid rain? Part 1